Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1
Option 2

Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. T2 Turbo 25T (25TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | T2 Turbo 25T (25TH/s) | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | T2T | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 25 TH/s Best | 1.16 GH/s | T2 Turbo 25T (25TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2050W | 0W Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 82.00 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 49.2 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.16 | $0.04 Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$64.86 | $1.24 Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | HYDRO | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 141 x 391 x 220 mm | 900 x 132 x 486 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9000 g | N/A | Contextual |
T2 Turbo 25T (25TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
T2 Turbo 25T (25TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 25 TH/s compared to Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16GH/s)'s 1.16 GH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.