Option 1
Option 2

T2 Turbo (24TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | T2 Turbo (24TH/s) | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | T2 | E11 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 24 TH/s Best | 9.5 GH/s | T2 Turbo (24TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1980W Best | 2470W | T2 Turbo (24TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 82.50 J/TH Best | 260.00 J/GH | T2 Turbo (24TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 47.5 kWh Best | 59.3 kWh | T2 Turbo (24TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.07 | $1.15 Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$62.14 | $34.60 Best | Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 150 x 400 x 180 mm | 400 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 7500 g Best | 14200 g | T2 Turbo (24TH/s) |
T2 Turbo (24TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
T2 Turbo (24TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
T2 Turbo (24TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 24 TH/s compared to Antminer E11 (9.5GH/s)'s 9.5 GH/s.
Yes, T2 Turbo (24TH/s) is more energy efficient at 82.50 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.