Option 1
Option 2

Antminer X3 (220KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. T3 50T (50TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | T3 50T (50TH/s) | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | T3 | X3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 50 TH/s Best | 220 KH/s | T3 50T (50TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3100W | 465W Best | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 62.00 J/TH | 2.11 J/KH Best | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 74.4 kWh | 11.2 kWh Best | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.89 | -$0.67 Best | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$86.82 | -$20.09 Best | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 272 x 268 x 203 mm | 125 x 334 x 207 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 10000 g | 5500 g Best | Antminer X3 (220KH/s) |
T3 50T (50TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer X3 (220KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
T3 50T (50TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 50 TH/s compared to Antminer X3 (220KH/s)'s 220 KH/s.
Antminer X3 (220KH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.11 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.