Option 1
T3 50T (50TH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) leads this comparison
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. T3 50T (50TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | T3 50T (50TH/s) | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | T3 | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 50 TH/s Best | 1.1 TH/s | T3 50T (50TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3100W | 900W Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 62.00 J/TH Best | 818.18 J/TH | T3 50T (50TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 74.4 kWh | 21.6 kWh Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.89 | -$0.96 Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$86.82 | -$28.68 Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 272 x 268 x 203 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 10000 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
T3 50T (50TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
T3 50T (50TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: T3 50T (50TH/s) or SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)?
T3 50T (50TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 50 TH/s compared to SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)'s 1.1 TH/s.
Is T3 50T (50TH/s) more efficient than SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)?
Yes, T3 50T (50TH/s) is more energy efficient at 62.00 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.