Option 1
T3 (105TH/s)
Option 2
Antminer S9 (14TH/s)
T3 (105TH/s) leads this comparison
T3 (105TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S9 (14TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | T3 (105TH/s) | Antminer S9 (14TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fluminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | T | S9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 105 TH/s Best | 14 TH/s | T3 (105TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1650W | 1372W Best | Antminer S9 (14TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 15.71 J/TH Best | 98.00 J/TH | T3 (105TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 39.6 kWh | 32.9 kWh Best | Antminer S9 (14TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.67 Best | -$1.58 | T3 (105TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $20.22 Best | -$47.27 | T3 (105TH/s) |
| Price | $1,372.95 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 67 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 450 x 300 x 140 mm | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 12600 g | 4200 g Best | Antminer S9 (14TH/s) |
Performance
T3 (105TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
T3 (105TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: T3 (105TH/s) or Antminer S9 (14TH/s)?
T3 (105TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 105 TH/s compared to Antminer S9 (14TH/s)'s 14 TH/s.
Is T3 (105TH/s) more efficient than Antminer S9 (14TH/s)?
Yes, T3 (105TH/s) is more energy efficient at 15.71 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.