Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) and Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | KS7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1.55 MH/s | 40 TH/s Best | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 3080W | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 77.00 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 73.9 kWh | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $3.22 Best | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $96.74 Best | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 347 x 160 mm | 430 x 290 x 196 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g Best | 17000 g | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 40 TH/s compared to Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s)'s 1.55 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.