Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. AvalonMiner 1066 (50TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) | AvalonMiner 1066 (50TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | AvalonMiner | Contextual |
| Model | M10 | A10 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 33 TH/s | 50 TH/s Best | AvalonMiner 1066 (50TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2145W Best | 3250W | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 65.00 J/TH | 65.00 J/TH | Tie |
| Daily energy use | 51.5 kWh Best | 78.0 kWh | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.04 Best | -$3.07 | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$61.16 Best | -$92.10 | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | 195 x 331 x 292 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 8550 g Best | 11400 g | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
AvalonMiner 1066 (50TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Both miners are tied when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AvalonMiner 1066 (50TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 50 TH/s compared to Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s)'s 33 TH/s.
Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) and AvalonMiner 1066 (50TH/s) have the same listed efficiency.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.