Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M10 | Z9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 55 TH/s Best | 10 KH/s | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3500W | 300W Best | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 63.64 J/TH | 30.00 J/KH Best | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 84.0 kWh | 7.2 kWh Best | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$3.31 | -$0.05 Best | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$99.30 | -$1.56 Best | Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 10700 g | N/A | Contextual |
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 55 TH/s compared to Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s)'s 10 KH/s.
Antminer Z9 Mini (10KH/s) is more energy efficient at 30.00 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.