Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) vs EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s)
Option 2
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) leads this comparison
EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) | EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | Bombax Miner | Contextual |
| Model | M10 | EZ100 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 55 TH/s Best | 3.8 GH/s | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3500W | 760W Best | EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 63.64 J/TH Best | 200.00 J/GH | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 84.0 kWh | 18.2 kWh Best | EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$3.31 | $1.01 Best | EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$99.30 | $30.17 Best | EZ100-C (3.8GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | 440 x 427 x 133 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 10700 g Best | 12700 g | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) |
Performance
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) or EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)?
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 55 TH/s compared to EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)'s 3.8 GH/s.
Is Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) more efficient than EZ100-C (3.8GH/s)?
Yes, Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) is more energy efficient at 63.64 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.