Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | M10 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 55 TH/s Best | 360 MH/s | Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3500W | 0W Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 63.64 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 84.0 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$3.31 | $13.26 Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$99.30 | $397.80 Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 10700 g | N/A | Contextual |
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M10S (55TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 55 TH/s compared to Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s)'s 360 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.