Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M30S+ (100MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M30S+ (100MH/s) | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | K7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 100 MH/s | 63.5 TH/s Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 3080W | Whatsminer M30S+ (100MH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 48.50 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 73.9 kWh | Whatsminer M30S+ (100MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $1.21 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $36.44 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $1,727.88 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 47 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 155 x 425 x 225 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to Whatsminer M30S+ (100MH/s)'s 100 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.