Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | M50 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 128 TH/s Best | 10.5 MH/s | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3276W | 0W Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 25.59 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 78.6 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.57 | $0.36 Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$17.02 | $10.71 Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s) |
| Price | $637.86 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | 125 x 320 x 190 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 4200 g | Contextual |
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to Antminer T9+ (10.5MH/s)'s 10.5 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.