Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Option 2
EZ100 (12.5KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M53S++ (328TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.065/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M53S++ (328TH/s) | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Whatsminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | M53S++ | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 328 TH/s Best | 12.5 KH/s | Whatsminer M53S++ (328TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 7216W | 0W Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 22.00 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 173.2 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$11.26 | $0.00 Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$337.71 | $0.00 Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
| Price | $1,901.38 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | hydro | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 213 x 395 x 300 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 30000 g | 16400 g Best | EZ100 (12.5KH/s) |
Whatsminer M53S++ (328TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M53S++ (328TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 328 TH/s compared to EZ100 (12.5KH/s)'s 12.5 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
