Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer A3 (815GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M70 | A3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 218 TH/s Best | 815 GH/s | WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3161W | 1275W Best | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 14.50 J/TH | 1.56 J/GH Best | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 75.9 kWh | 30.6 kWh Best | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $2.89 Best | -$1.66 | WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $86.64 Best | -$49.68 | WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) |
| Price | $2,239.23 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 25 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 430 x 226 x 155 mm | 125 x 321 x 208 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 15000 g | 4200 g Best | Antminer A3 (815GH/s) |
WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer A3 (815GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M70 (218TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 218 TH/s compared to Antminer A3 (815GH/s)'s 815 GH/s.
Antminer A3 (815GH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.56 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.