Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) and Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | WhatsMiner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M79 | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1.35 PH/s Best | 12.5 TH/s | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 20000W | 1576W Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 14814.81 J/PH | 126.08 J/TH Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 480.0 kWh | 37.8 kWh Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $20.67 Best | -$1.92 | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $620.10 Best | -$57.58 | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | HYDRO | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 3800 g | Contextual |
WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.35 PH/s compared to Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s)'s 12.5 TH/s.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 126.08 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.