Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s) | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 680 MH/s | 12.5 TH/s Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 1576W | WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 126.08 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 37.8 kWh | WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $24.29 Best | -$1.88 | WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $728.70 Best | -$56.38 | WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | HYDRO | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 86 x 663 x 483 mm | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 29500 g | 3800 g Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12.5 TH/s compared to WhatsMiner M7DS (680MH/s)'s 680 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.