Option 1
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Option 2
Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s)
Balanced match
X16-Q (1.95GH/s) and Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) | Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jasminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | X16 | S5 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1.95 GH/s | 1.16 TH/s Best | Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 620W | 590W Best | Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 317.95 J/GH Best | 510.82 J/TH | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 14.9 kWh | 14.2 kWh Best | Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.17 Best | -$0.81 | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $5.02 Best | -$24.29 | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 360 x 134 x 482 mm | 137 x 298 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 10000 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X16-Q (1.95GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: X16-Q (1.95GH/s) or Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s)?
Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.16 TH/s compared to X16-Q (1.95GH/s)'s 1.95 GH/s.
Is X16-Q (1.95GH/s) more efficient than Antminer S5 (1.16TH/s)?
Yes, X16-Q (1.95GH/s) is more energy efficient at 317.95 J/GH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.