ASIC miner comparison

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) vs X4-C 1U (450MH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
VS
X4-C 1U (450MH/s)
Higher hashrate
X16
Better efficiency
X4-C 1U
Estimated net daily
X16
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

X16-Q (1.95GH/s)

Ask availability
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.95 GH/s
Net daily
$0.17
Open product page

Option 2

X4-C 1U (450MH/s)

Ask availability
X4-C 1U (450MH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
450 MH/s
Net daily
-$0.11
Open product page

Balanced match

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) and X4-C 1U (450MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.

X16
3
metric wins
X4-C 1U
3
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureX16-Q (1.95GH/s)X4-C 1U (450MH/s)Advantage
Brand
Jasminer
Jasminer
Contextual
Model
X16
X4-C 1U
Contextual
Hashrate
1.95 GH/s
Best
450 MH/s
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Power Consumption
620W
240W
Best
X4-C 1U (450MH/s)
Efficiency
317.95 J/GH
0.53 J/MH
Best
X4-C 1U (450MH/s)
Daily energy use
14.9 kWh
5.8 kWh
Best
X4-C 1U (450MH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$0.17
Best
-$0.11
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$5.02
Best
-$3.17
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
360 x 134 x 482 mm
450 x 462 x 44 mm
Contextual
Weight
10000 g
N/A
Contextual

Performance

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

X4-C 1U (450MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: X16-Q (1.95GH/s) or X4-C 1U (450MH/s)?

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.95 GH/s compared to X4-C 1U (450MH/s)'s 450 MH/s.

Is X16-Q (1.95GH/s) more efficient than X4-C 1U (450MH/s)?

X4-C 1U (450MH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.53 J/MH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.