Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) and X4-C 1U (450MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) | X4-C 1U (450MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jasminer | Jasminer | Contextual |
| Model | X16 | X4-C 1U | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1.95 GH/s Best | 450 MH/s | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 620W | 240W Best | X4-C 1U (450MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 317.95 J/GH | 0.53 J/MH Best | X4-C 1U (450MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 14.9 kWh | 5.8 kWh Best | X4-C 1U (450MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.17 Best | -$0.11 | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $5.02 Best | -$3.17 | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 360 x 134 x 482 mm | 450 x 462 x 44 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 10000 g | N/A | Contextual |
X16-Q (1.95GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
X4-C 1U (450MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
X16-Q (1.95GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.95 GH/s compared to X4-C 1U (450MH/s)'s 450 MH/s.
X4-C 1U (450MH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.53 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.