Option 1

Option 2

X4 BRICK (65MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jasminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | X4 | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 65 MH/s | 12.5 TH/s Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 30W Best | 1576W | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.46 J/MH Best | 126.08 J/TH | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 0.7 kWh Best | 37.8 kWh | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.01 Best | -$1.90 | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$0.40 Best | -$56.98 | X4 BRICK (65MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 257 x 200 x 100 mm | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4800 g | 3800 g Best | Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) |
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
X4 BRICK (65MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T9 (12.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 12.5 TH/s compared to X4 BRICK (65MH/s)'s 65 MH/s.
Yes, X4 BRICK (65MH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.46 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.