Option 1
X4 (2.5GH/s)
Option 2
Zig D1 (48GH/s)
X4 (2.5GH/s) leads this comparison
X4 (2.5GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Zig D1 (48GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X4 (2.5GH/s) | Zig D1 (48GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Jasminer | Dayun | Contextual |
| Model | X4 | Zig | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.5 GH/s | 48 GH/s Best | Zig D1 (48GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1200W Best | 2200W | X4 (2.5GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 480.00 J/GH | 45.83 J/GH Best | Zig D1 (48GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 28.8 kWh Best | 52.8 kWh | X4 (2.5GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.55 Best | -$3.02 | X4 (2.5GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$16.44 Best | -$90.54 | X4 (2.5GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 290 x 300 x 170 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 9850 g | Contextual |
Performance
Zig D1 (48GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Zig D1 (48GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: X4 (2.5GH/s) or Zig D1 (48GH/s)?
Zig D1 (48GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 48 GH/s compared to X4 (2.5GH/s)'s 2.5 GH/s.
Is X4 (2.5GH/s) more efficient than Zig D1 (48GH/s)?
Zig D1 (48GH/s) is more energy efficient at 45.83 J/GH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.