Option 1
X5 (850MH/s)
Option 2
Antminer E3 (190MH/s)
Antminer E3 (190MH/s) leads this comparison
Antminer E3 (190MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. X5 (850MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X5 (850MH/s) | Antminer E3 (190MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | X5 | E3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 850 MH/s Best | 190 MH/s | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1450W | 760W Best | Antminer E3 (190MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.71 J/MH Best | 4.00 J/MH | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.8 kWh | 18.2 kWh Best | Antminer E3 (190MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.77 | -$0.99 Best | Antminer E3 (190MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$53.04 | -$29.83 Best | Antminer E3 (190MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 375 x 190 mm | 130 x 399 x 328 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g Best | 10500 g | X5 (850MH/s) |
Performance
X5 (850MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X5 (850MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: X5 (850MH/s) or Antminer E3 (190MH/s)?
X5 (850MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 850 MH/s compared to Antminer E3 (190MH/s)'s 190 MH/s.
Is X5 (850MH/s) more efficient than Antminer E3 (190MH/s)?
Yes, X5 (850MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.71 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.