Option 1
X5 (850MH/s)
Option 2
Antminer KS7 (40TH/s)
X5 (850MH/s) leads this comparison
X5 (850MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X5 (850MH/s) | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | X5 | KS7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 850 MH/s | 40 TH/s Best | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1450W Best | 3080W | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.71 J/MH Best | 77.00 J/TH | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.8 kWh Best | 73.9 kWh | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.77 | $3.22 Best | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$53.04 | $96.74 Best | Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 375 x 190 mm | 430 x 290 x 196 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g Best | 17000 g | X5 (850MH/s) |
Performance
Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X5 (850MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: X5 (850MH/s) or Antminer KS7 (40TH/s)?
Antminer KS7 (40TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 40 TH/s compared to X5 (850MH/s)'s 850 MH/s.
Is X5 (850MH/s) more efficient than Antminer KS7 (40TH/s)?
Yes, X5 (850MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.71 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.