Option 1
X5 (850MH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)
Balanced match
X5 (850MH/s) and SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X5 (850MH/s) | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | X5 | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 850 MH/s | 2.2 TH/s Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1450W Best | 1600W | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.71 J/MH Best | 727.27 J/TH | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 34.8 kWh Best | 38.4 kWh | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.77 | -$1.62 Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$53.04 | -$48.72 Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 375 x 190 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X5 (850MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: X5 (850MH/s) or SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.2 TH/s compared to X5 (850MH/s)'s 850 MH/s.
Is X5 (850MH/s) more efficient than SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
Yes, X5 (850MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.71 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.