Option 1
Option 2

X6 Miner (860MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | X6 Miner (860MH/s) | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | FusionSilicon | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | X6 | Z11 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 860 MH/s Best | 135 KH/s | X6 Miner (860MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1079W Best | 1418W | X6 Miner (860MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.25 J/MH Best | 10.50 J/KH | X6 Miner (860MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 25.9 kWh Best | 34.0 kWh | X6 Miner (860MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.23 | $3.45 Best | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$37.01 | $103.44 Best | Antminer Z11 (135KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 130 x 340 x 198 mm | 134 x 302 x 242 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4300 g Best | 5400 g | X6 Miner (860MH/s) |
X6 Miner (860MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
X6 Miner (860MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
X6 Miner (860MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 860 MH/s compared to Antminer Z11 (135KH/s)'s 135 KH/s.
Yes, X6 Miner (860MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.25 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.