Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Zig M1 (2.61KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Zig M1 (2.61KH/s) | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | T9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.61 KH/s | 10.5 TH/s Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 1432W | Zig M1 (2.61KH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 136.38 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 34.4 kWh | Zig M1 (2.61KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | -$1.73 | Zig M1 (2.61KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | -$51.96 | Zig M1 (2.61KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 140 x 300 x 170 mm | 125 x 320 x 190 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5800 g | 4200 g Best | Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) |
Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T9+ (10.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 10.5 TH/s compared to Zig M1 (2.61KH/s)'s 2.61 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.