Option 1

Option 2

Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. A1 Pro (23TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) | A1 Pro (23TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Aisen | Contextual |
| Model | E9 | A1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.4 GH/s | 23 TH/s Best | A1 Pro (23TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1920W Best | 2200W | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 800.00 J/GH | 95.65 J/TH Best | A1 Pro (23TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 46.1 kWh Best | 52.8 kWh | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.46 Best | -$2.43 | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$43.94 Best | -$72.84 | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 400 x 290 mm | 255 x 445 x 215 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 14200 g | N/A | Contextual |
A1 Pro (23TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
A1 Pro (23TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
A1 Pro (23TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 23 TH/s compared to Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)'s 2.4 GH/s.
A1 Pro (23TH/s) is more energy efficient at 95.65 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.