Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) vs A40 (3.3TH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s)
Option 2
A40 (3.3TH/s)
A40 (3.3TH/s) leads this comparison
A40 (3.3TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) | A40 (3.3TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Miner | Contextual |
| Model | S23 | A40 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1.16 PH/s Best | 3.3 TH/s | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 11020W | 1600W Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 9500.00 J/PH | 484.85 J/TH Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 264.5 kWh | 38.4 kWh Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $20.80 Best | -$1.73 | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $624.04 Best | -$52.02 | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) |
| Price | $29,493.00 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | HYDRO | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 900 x 132 x 486 mm | 360 x 290 x 185 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 60000 g | 14500 g Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
Performance
Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
A40 (3.3TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) or A40 (3.3TH/s)?
Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.16 PH/s compared to A40 (3.3TH/s)'s 3.3 TH/s.
Is Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) more efficient than A40 (3.3TH/s)?
A40 (3.3TH/s) is more energy efficient at 484.85 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.