Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M33 | S23 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 242 TH/s | 1.16 PH/s Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 7260W Best | 11020W | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 30.00 J/TH Best | 9500.00 J/PH | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 174.2 kWh Best | 264.5 kWh | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.72 | $20.80 Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$81.73 | $624.04 Best | Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $29,493.00 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 47 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | HYDRO | HYDRO | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 482 x 86 x 650 mm | 900 x 132 x 486 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 27500 g Best | 60000 g | Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) |
Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S23 Hydro 3U (1.16PH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.16 PH/s compared to Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s)'s 242 TH/s.
Yes, Whatsminer M33S++ (242TH/s) is more energy efficient at 30.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.