Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (17GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Whatsminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M60 | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 212 TH/s Best | 17 GH/s | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3600W | 3570W Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 16.98 J/TH Best | 210.00 J/GH | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 86.4 kWh | 85.7 kWh Best | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $3.11 Best | $1.41 | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $93.18 Best | $42.28 | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
| Price | $1,724.83 Best | $3,152.70 | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
| Estimated ROI | 18 mo Best | 73 mo | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 430 x 226 x 155 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 15000 g Best | 17000 g | WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) |
WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 212 TH/s compared to Antminer L9 (17GH/s)'s 17 GH/s.
Yes, WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) is more energy efficient at 16.98 J/TH.
WhatsMiner M60S+ (212TH/s) has the stronger estimated payback period at 18 mo, based on current product pricing and $0.060/kWh hosted electricity.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.