WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) vs Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s)
Option 2
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) leads this comparison
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Whatsminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | M60 | K7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 226 TH/s Best | 63.5 TH/s | WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3600W | 3080W Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 15.93 J/TH Best | 48.50 J/TH | WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 86.4 kWh | 73.9 kWh Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.94 Best | $1.21 | WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $58.08 Best | $36.44 | WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) |
| Price | $1,999.63 | $1,727.88 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Estimated ROI | 34 mo Best | 47 mo | WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 430 x 226 x 155 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 15000 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) or Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)?
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 226 TH/s compared to Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)'s 63.5 TH/s.
Is WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) more efficient than Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)?
Yes, WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) is more energy efficient at 15.93 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
WhatsMiner M60S++ (226TH/s) has the stronger estimated payback period at 34 mo, based on current product pricing and $0.060/kWh hosted electricity.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.